EU's ban on billion-pound illegally logged timber trade only the 'first step'

| 8th July 2010

Europe is currently consuming around 12 per cent of the world's illegal logging

New regulations will apply to forest owners and companies importing timber but not to the rest of the supply chain and leaves sanctions down to individual countries

Europe has taken the first step in attempting to stop the billion-pound trade in illegally logged wood and timber products with MEPs voting to introduce tough new regulations on importers.

While the EU has spoken out against illegal timber, a major driver of deforestation worldwide, it has up until now remained one of the trade's biggest markets. Europe currently consumes around 12 per cent of the world's illegal logged timber, with the UK alone spending £700 million a year, according to estimates by WWF.

Under the new regulations agreed by European MPs, companies importing timber into the EU will be required to keep evidence documenting who the wood was bought from and where it was harvested to ensure their timber has been felled legally.

In practice this means companies will have to do as much as they can to ensure their timber is legal and, most importantly, demonstrate that they have done this. If they haven't done this 'due diligence' they will be liable for prosecution.


NGOs, such as Greenpeace, which have campaigned for more than a decade on the issue said removing demand from Europe for illegal wood would have a significant impact on reducing deforestation. The US imposed similar obligations on its timber importers in May 2008 and there is already at least one ongoing legal case against a supplier.

However, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) warned that the success of the EU's new regulations would depend upon tough action by individual member states, who will ultimately be responsible for punishing operators who break the rules.

It said countries like Italy had a furniture industry that relied heavily on illegally-imported tropical hardwoods and showed little evidence of internal political will to tackle the problem.

'What we need to focus on now is ensuring that issues such as penalties, which are the responsibility of member states, are very strong. After all, this law is only as strong as its weakest point.

'But finally we have something we can use when we know illegality has occurred, which was what we wanted,' said EIA campaigner Faith Doherty.

The rules, which are unlikely to come into effect until 2012, will only apply to traders who first place timber and wood products onto the European market. Campaigners had been keen for a wider system to include anyone who traded in illegal timber.

Can we trust the FSC?
It's the logo we all look for when buying furniture and wood products. But the Forest Stewardship Council has come in for some serious criticism. Matilda Lee looks at both sides of the argument
On the frontline: Forest Activists
Reporting from the front-line of environmental activism, Andrew Wasley takes a closer look at those combating illegal logging
Persuading your local station to plant fruit trees
Armed with just a good idea and big dose of enthusiasm you can transform a bleak area into a mini orchard. Plus, the best way to approach a station manager...
Activists hail 'historic' Canadian forest agreement
Logging companies agree to deal safeguarding an area of endangered boreal forest twice the size of Germany


The Ecologist has a formidable reputation built on fifty years of investigative journalism and compelling commentary from writers across the world. Now, as we face the compound crises of climate breakdown, biodiversity collapse and social injustice, the need for rigorous, trusted and ethical journalism has never been greater. This is the moment to consolidate, connect and rise to meet the challenges of our changing world. The Ecologist is owned and published by the Resurgence Trust. Support The Resurgence Trust from as little as £1. Thank you. Donate here