Letter - Time to get serious with the EU Emission Trading Scheme

| 27th May 2010
Carbon dioxide emissions
Mark Chadwick from Carbon Clear argues a full auctioning of ETS permits is needed if the trading scheme is to start working

Research just published by the Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) shows that the steel and cement companies that lobbied the government for European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) permits are due to make billions of pounds in windfall profits.

Hopefully this scandalous evidence will pressure the new Tory/Lib Dem coalition to fulfil its promise of pushing the EU for full auctioning of ETS permits sooner rather later.
In theory, the ETS has great potential to make Europe’s efforts to fight climate change both more efficient and effective. At the moment however, as the report shows, the EU simply gives away a large portion of its ETS permits to the big polluters.

These permits authorise the holders to pollute the atmosphere, to agreed levels, at no cost. Yes – for free. This is absurd. The cost to the environment is clearly not zero. It’s mad that this forms the heart of an emission reduction scheme.
The current arrangements also have two very unwanted consequences: It encourages companies to grossly overstate their predicted emissions in order to sell those they don’t use to make a windfall profit (to the tune of £1 billion in the case of Arcelor Mittal, according to the CEO report) while at the same time removing any economic incentive for them improve their energy efficiency.
Auctioning the total quota of ETS permits would ensure that companies only receive the number they feel they will really use – and removes the incentive to be greedy in order to sell on excess permits at a profit. Equally important, it will make economic sense for companies to make efficiency changes that cost less than the equivalent amount of ETS permits. So if a new technology, like a boiler upgrade, costs £5 per tonne of carbon saved, versus a carbon price of £10 per tonne, making the technology investment becomes the sensible thing to do.
The other way of making ETS permits an effective stick (or carrot) for polluters to improve their energy efficiency is to put sufficiently few up for auction. This will push the price of the permits high enough to ensure that many companies take big action to pollute less – the whole point of the ETS in the first place.
Let’s hope the coalition will support these intentions with solid action, both at home and at the EU, where the ultimate decisions of the fate of the EU ETS will be made.

Yours faithfully,


Mark Chadwick is Chief Executive of Carbon Clear, an organisation specialising in carbon management

Industry threats to relocate over carbon targets exposed as 'misleading'
Heavy industry has pleaded for special treatment since the European Emissions Trading System was set up, but a new report suggests their complaints were exaggerated


The Ecologist has a formidable reputation built on fifty years of investigative journalism and compelling commentary from writers across the world. Now, as we face the compound crises of climate breakdown, biodiversity collapse and social injustice, the need for rigorous, trusted and ethical journalism has never been greater. This is the moment to consolidate, connect and rise to meet the challenges of our changing world. The Ecologist is owned and published by the Resurgence Trust. Support The Resurgence Trust from as little as £1. Thank you. Donate now.