Pesticide companies told to fund clean up of waterways

| 10th November 2010
A survey of the River Trent
A survey of the river found most fish had been wiped out by the chemical spill

Crop protection industry should fund the cost of cleaning up waterways and restoring habitats

Coalition of environmental groups including RSPB and the National Trust urge government to introduce a levy on chemical industry and enforce bigger fines for polluters
The pesticide industry should pay towards reducing pollution of waterways as well as creating clean water habitats to offset some of the damage caused by the use of its chemicals by farmers, argue conservation groups.

Government figures show that more than two thirds of rivers in England and Wales are failing European targets for water quality and that agricultural is the main source of pollution.

In a 'Blueprint for Water', the groups say it is wrong for taxpayers to continue paying for cleaning up polluted water through their water bills and through government mitigation schemes like Catchment Sensitive Farming, which costs around £25 million a year.

It says the crop protection and fertiliser industry should be the ones funding measures to reduce agricultural run-off pollution and creating new clean water habitats to mitigate ecological damage.

'If government is serious about big society then it should be the fertiliser and pesticide producers who should pay to deal with the problem of agricultural pollution, not the taxpayer,' said RSPB head of water policy Rob Cunningham.

The Crop Protection Association said any tax on the chemical industry would be a 'step backwards' and would not be dealing with the problem. It urged the government to continue working with the sector on voluntary initiatives to reduce impact of farming use of pesticides.

The blueprint, which was first launched in 2006 and has been updated this week to target the new government, says it is time to lift the limit on fines that could be imposed on polluters. Both the Wildfowl & Wetlands and Angling Trusts said that as well as being too infrequent the current fines were 'nominal' and did not reflect the long-term damage caused to the ecosystem by the pollution incidents.

The blueprint also calls for household water bills to be metered so that higher users pay more and for the restoration of wetlands and floodplains.

Water companies, not farmers, to blame for river pollution
Household sewage waste rather than farm slurry should be the target of tough pollution measures to reduce phosphorus levels in English rivers, says study
Fishing and the environment: why the two are inextricably linked
Anglers may set out to hunt fish - for fun or food - but they are also some of greatest protectors of aquatic environments, argues Robert MacDougall-Davis
Environment Agency demands tougher fines for polluters
Agency calls on courts to hand out stronger penalties for waste and pollution criminals
Commonly prescribed drugs linked to shrimp population decline
Study finds that antidepressants in waste water flowing into rivers and estuaries can make coastal marine shrimps more susceptible to predators
UK wildlife becoming the ‘living dead’
While the UN is celebrating the international year of biodiversity conservation groups in the UK worry that a rising number of isolated populations are in danger of becoming extinct

More from this author


The Ecologist has a formidable reputation built on fifty years of investigative journalism and compelling commentary from writers across the world. Now, as we face the compound crises of climate breakdown, biodiversity collapse and social injustice, the need for rigorous, trusted and ethical journalism has never been greater. This is the moment to consolidate, connect and rise to meet the challenges of our changing world. The Ecologist is owned and published by the Resurgence Trust. Support The Resurgence Trust from as little as £1. Thank you. Donate here