With floating platforms, offshore wind cost set to plunge

|
DCNS and Nass&Wind designed this 'Winflo' floating wind turbine.

DCNS and Nass&Wind designed this 'Winflo' floating wind turbine.

Floating wind turbines offer huge falls in the cost of offshore wind power, writes Paul Brown, and could be generating power in UK waters at well under the cost of new nuclear by 2020, provided adequate support.
Floating wind concepts have the potential to reach below £100/MWh in commercial deployments, according to platform developers, with the leading concepts estimating even lower costs of £85-£95MWh.

The race is on to prove that offshore wind power on floating platforms can be a significant power source for coastal states, with more than a dozen designs in development.

All countries with deep seas off their coasts can exploit the technology by anchoring wind farms near their major cities. Countries supporting these floating power stations include Japan, the US, and European countries bordering the North Atlantic and Mediterranean. Island states with limited land space would also benefit.

There are already successful demonstration platforms in Norway and Portugal, proving that the technology works. The battle now is to get costs down so that offshore wind can compete with other renewables.

The latest group to claim a breakthrough is the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Spain.

Its developers have designed and patented a floating platform for offshore wind turbines that they claim can reduce energy costs to €120 (£85p) per megawatt hour (MWh) - less than the cost of electricity from a new nuclear power station.

Efficient designs, plunging costs

They say the cost reduction is achieved through more efficient design and the use of concrete rather than steel, reducing costs by 60%.

Climent Molins and Alexis Campos, researchers at the Barcelona School of Civil Engineering, have developed another prototype called the WindCrete, a cylindrical structure with a large float and a ballast base that makes it self-stabilising.

They say the main innovation of this model is its seamless, monolithic structure. It is also built of concrete, which is cheaper than steel, concrete is said to be more resistant in the marine environment, needing less maintenance and lasting for about 50 years.

The absence of joints in the platform is designed to increase its ability to withstand the effects of wind and seawater, avoiding the damage normally caused by wave action.

The WindCrete includes a 5-megawatt (MW) wind turbine that could be upgraded to carry rotors producing up to 15 MW with a relatively small increase in cost, making it far more economical.

Partially-submerged offshore platforms of this type require a minimum depth: 90 metres in the case of the WindCrete. However, there is no technical maximum depth for their installation. In the Gulf of Mexico, for example, there are floating oil platforms anchored at depths of up to 2,300 metres.

The WindCrete prototype, developed as part of a European project to promote innovation in this area, features in a report by the UK's Carbon Trust on the current state of the floating wind technology market, written for the Scottish government.

Floating wind concepts have the potential to reach below £100/MWh in commercial deployments, according to platform developers, with the leading concepts estimating even lower costs of £85-£95MWh.

Scotland has many deep sea locations close to its coasts and high wind speeds, so it is perfect for large-scale floating wind farms if they can be made competitive. The report examines key trends, costs and barriers to commercial exploitation, and includes an analysis of 18 models currently on the market (see photo, above right). It concludes:

"Floating wind concepts have the potential to reach below £100 / MWh in commercial deployments, according to platform developers, with the leading concepts estimating even lower costs of £85-£95 / MWh, which would be competitive with fixed-bottom projects if floating wind reaches commercial scale deployment in the 2020s."

That well below the prices in the February 2015 round of offshore wind contracts, which came in at £114-£120 / MWh for 15 years. It would also make offshore wind substantially cheaper than nuclear power from Hinkley C, which requires a price of £92.50 / MWh in 2012 £s for 35 years.

Tidal power - lagoons and turbines

Another area of development that offers promise for some coastal states is tidal power of various types.

It is not a new technology. The Rance Tidal Power Station in northwest France opened in 1966 and produces around 100 MW of electricity - enough to power 130,000 homes. But new types of tidal power have been proved in the prototype stage and are expected to grow in importance.

One of the most promising is undersea turbines, rather like wind turbines but smaller. They have been developed in Europe and are proving successful, particularly where the tide is strongest - such as at the entrance to sea inlets or between islands.

Another system under development - and already given the go-ahead by the British government - is a tidal lagoon in the Severn estuary between England and South Wales. A dam will be constructed an will fill as the tide comes in, driving turbines as it does so. It will then empty, again producing electricity as the tide flows out through the turbines.

Because the UK and Canada have the highest tides in the world, they are the two countries currently most interested in these technologies, although there are concerns in the UK that the Conservative government is currently lukewarm in its support for renewables because it has increased subsidies for nuclear and fossil fuels.

The improving prospects for the tidal power industry will be discussed at a conference, the International Tidal Energy Summit, to be held in London from 23-25 November.

Government ministers in the UK will face pressure there to support the industry, which insiders claim needs extra political help to maintain the UK's technological lead in the area.

 

 

The report: 'Floating Offshore Wind Market Technology Review'.

Event: 'Turn the Tide: Deploy Your Turbine, Reduce Cost & Improve Efficiency' takes place in London, 23rd-25th November.

Paul Brown is a founding editor of Climate News Network, and a former environment correspondent of the Guardian newspaper.

Donate to The Ecologist and support high impact environmental journalism and analysis.

  • Offshore wind turbine under construction at Burbo Bank, North Sea. Photo: The Danish Wind Industry Association / Vindmølleindustrien via Flickr (CC BY-NC).

    Offshore wind powers ahead as prices drop 30% below nuclear

    Kieran Cooke
     |
    The cost of offshore wind power in the North Sea is 30% lower than that of new nuclear, writes Kieran Cooke - helped along by low oil and steel prices, reduced maintenance and mass production. By 2030 the sector is expected to supply 7% of Europe's electricity.
  • The key to further big increases in wind and solar capacity is to store surplus power as gas, then burn it CCGT gas power stations when needed to meet demand. Photo: Royd Moor wind farm, Yorkshire, by steve p2008 via Flickr (CC BY).

    Renewable energy can 'keep the lights on' - here's how

    David Elliott
     |
    Critics of renewable energy sources like wind and solar claim that they are inefficient, unreliable and need to be backed up by coal and gas, writes David Elliott. But we have the technology to match green power supply and demand at affordable cost without fossil fuels - by deploying the 'smart grid', using 'green gas' made from surplus power, and raising energy efficiency.
  • Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm. Photo: Harald Pettersen / Statoil via Flickr / NHD-INFO (CC BY).

    All at sea? Government's strong talk on offshore wind masks feeble ambition

    Ian Broadbent
    Peter Strachan
     |
    Following premature cutbacks to onshore wind farms the UK's energy security will increasingly depend on large scale offshore wind power, write Ian Broadbent & Peter Strachan. But while energy secretary Amber Rudd talked the sector up in her speech yesterday, she revealed feeble ambition, and said nothing to overcome investors' fears of being left out in the cold.

More from this author

  • Sunset years ... power plant and Exxon Mobil oil refinery in Joliet, Illinois. Photo: Greg Wass via Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA).

    Oil industry's sunset years: low prices, weak demand, poor outlook

    Paul Brown
     |
    With oil prices remaining low, the world's oil industry is facing bleak years ahead, writes Paul Brown. The global push to decarbonise the economy, combined with surging renewable energy and the trend to more efficient and electric vehicles, is denting investor confidence and pointing to the shrinking away of a once mighty and profitable industry.
  • The disastrous Okiluoto 3 EPR reactor under construction in Finland. The project is taking twice as long to complete, and costing twice as much, as promised. Photo: BBC World Service via Flickr (CC BY-NC).

    Time and money run out for nuclear revival

    Paul Brown
     |
    The nuclear industry faces an uncertain future as the reactor building boom is struck by unexpected costs, serious technical problems, and long, expensive delays, writes Paul Brown. Meanwhile renewables like wind and solar are offering investors an enviable combination of falling cost, low risk, fast build times, predictable returns and minimal long term liabilities.
  • VC Summer Nuclear Station Unit 1 in South Carolina, showing the Reactor and Turbine Buildings. An AP1000 Toshiba / Westinghouse reactor is under construction, much delayed, on the same site. Photo: SCE&G via Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain).

    Long-promised nuclear revival has run out of steam

    Paul Brown
     |
    A legacy of lies and covered-up accidents has left nuclear energy with a serious credibility gap, writes Paul Brown. But poor safety is only the beginning of the industry's problems. With 'new improved' reactor designs all running late and way over budget, any nuclear revival can only be sustained at massive, unaffordable taxpayer cost.