Estonia rejects ‘climate centered’ forestry

| 9th April 2020
Forest in Estonia
Flickr
Environmental groups condemn Estonia’s rejection of ‘climate and biodiversity centered’ forestry impact assessment.

The Estonian government is effectively abandoning any sustainable long-term vision and action compatible with biodiversity and climate goals.

The Estonian ministry of the environment has rejected an impact assessment by the Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn on the grounds that it used concerns about climate and biodiversity as its framework.

An open letter by the Global Forest Coalition and other groups states that Estonia is already one of the EU’s most intensive forest economies and opposition to over-logging is widespread, long-standing and well-grounded in facts. The letter calls on the Estonian ministry to reverse its decision. 

Government officials have promised that the new Forestry Development Plan will become a ‘social contract’ in which everyone will have a voice. However, key forestry decisions are already being made without taking into account that the new development plan might go against these decisions.

Biodiversity 

Katja Garson, forests and climate campaigner at Fern, said: “Healthy forests where biodiversity thrives and carbon is sequestered and stored for the long term are crucial for all of us. By rejecting this impact assessment and continuing to prioritise increased and destructive logging, the Estonian Government is effectively abandoning any sustainable long-term vision and action compatible with biodiversity and climate goals.”

The impact assessment determined that an annual logging volume larger than eight million cubic metres would endanger protected species under the EU Habitats Directive. Official logging volumes in recent years have surpassed that amount by half, and industry has expressed its intent to push logging volumes to 15 million cubic metres per year.

Martin Luiga of Estonian Forest Aid stressed the lack of international supervision over forest matters: “The situation we have here is not unique, it is just an extreme example of what is possible within the current EU framework. Such planning processes deserve much more attention than they usually receive.”

The letter points at biomass energy as the main culprit of the logging expansion. Burning wood for energy is still encouraged by EU legislation, although it has been repeatedly condemned by the EU Commission’s own scientific advisory council.

Simone Lovera, executive director of the Global Forest Coalition, said: “Conserving the remaining precious forest areas in Estonia is essential for halting global warming and biodiversity loss. It should at all costs be avoided that these forests are destroyed in the name of false solutions to climate change like bioenergy and the so-called bio-economy.”

This Article 

This article is based on a press release from the Global Forest Coalition. 

Help us keep The Ecologist working for the planet

The Ecologist website is a free service, published by The Resurgence Trust, a UK-based educational charity. We work hard - with a small budget and tiny editorial team - to bring you the wide-ranging, independent journalism we know you value and enjoy, but we need your help. Please make a donation to support The Ecologist platform. Thank you!

Donate to us here