Small amphibians at greater risk of extinction

White-lined leaf frog (Phyllomedusa vaillantii). Credit Geoff Gallice.

New study first to suggest reproduction levels of animals rather than on body size is crucial when calculating extinction risk.

More numerous and diverse babies increase the chances that at least some can survive the stress of environmental alterations, such as progressive climatic changes. 

The risk of extinction for amphibians – the most endangered animals on the planet – increases for species of smaller body size as their females produce fewer babies per birth, research led by Queen’s University Belfast has found. 

Biologists have long believed that animals of larger body size are more vulnerable to extinction – an idea supported by the widespread endangerment faced by iconic large-sized animals such as rhinos or whales.

This study is the first to suggest resetting the theory to focus on reproduction levels of animals rather than on body size when calculating extinction risk. More than 40 percent of amphibians currently face extinction.

Babies

The research has been published in the journal Global Ecology and Biogeography and was conducted in collaboration with Nottingham Trent University, Tel Aviv University, Exeter University and the University of Lincoln.

The accelerating extinctions of biodiversity worldwide are widely regarded as one of the most pressing challenges faced by humanity. Therefore, understanding the factors that drive extinctions has consolidated as a top priority for scientists in the era of climate change.

Amphibians, such as frogs, toads, salamanders and newts, in particular, have become the iconic example of human-induced extinctions, given that their declines exceed those of any other group of animals on Earth.

A rapidly growing extinction hypothesis suggests that larger body size increases the risk of extinction – this theory has been derived fundamentally from research on mammals.

This study is the first to investigate the causes behind extinction in amphibians based on the theory that it is not body size, but the number of babies a female produces per clutch that determines extinction risk.

Clutch

Dr Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, lecturer in evolutionary biology and macroecology from the School of Biological Sciences at Queen's University, and leading author on the research, explains: “More babies per clutch or birth means more variety among the babies.

"To some extent, it is like playing the lottery, the more tickets you play the higher your chances to win. In this case, more numerous and diverse babies increase the chances that at least some can survive the stress of environmental alterations, such as progressive climatic changes.”

The research team looked at amphibians from all over the world, and from their entire diversity - frogs, salamanders and caecilians. 

The team then matched the levels of endangerment of thousands of species and analysed this information against their body sizes and the number of babies they produce per clutch.

They found strong evidence that extinction risk increases towards species that produce fewer offspring, such as the ‘rain frogs’ (Eleutherodactylus), whereas extinction risk decreases towards species that produce more, such as different species of American water frogs (Lithobates) or the large-bodied ‘bufonid’ toads, which can lay up to 80,000 eggs in one clutch.

Biodiversity

In contrast with the widely held view about animal size as a ‘driver’ of extinctions, they found that the risk of extinction of a species did not match its size as accurately as it matched its reproduction.

Dr Pincheira-Donoso continued: “Our findings explain the discrepancies in the body size-extinction risk relationship observed between mammals and amphibians, given that larger mammals have fewer babies per birth and therefore extinction increases with larger body size, whereas in amphibians, larger females produce more babies, thus reducing extinction risk with larger body size.”

This new research suggests that placing an emphasis on the number of offspring that species produce, rather than simply on their large body sizes, could guide more effective human actions about what species or areas to protect during the fight against the loss of biodiversity.

This Author

Brendan Montague is editor of The Ecologist. This article is based on a press release from the University of Belfast.

 

Donate

The Ecologist has a formidable reputation built on fifty years of investigative journalism and compelling commentary from writers across the world. Now, as we face the compound crises of climate breakdown, biodiversity collapse and social injustice, the need for rigorous, trusted and ethical journalism has never been greater. This is the moment to consolidate, connect and rise to meet the challenges of our changing world. The Ecologist is owned and published by the Resurgence Trust. Support The Resurgence Trust from as little as £1. Thank you. Donate here