Nuclear WMD states sued - by the Marshall Islands

|
A US government photograph of Operation Redwing's Apache nuclear explosion in the Pacific Ocean's Marshall Islands on July 9, 1956.
A US government photograph of Operation Redwing's Apache nuclear explosion in the Pacific Ocean's Marshall Islands on July 9, 1956.
The US threatens to attack Iran if it tries to build a nuclear bomb, yet the US and other nuclear WMD states have ignored their treaty obligation to work toward nuclear disarmament, writes Rober Dodge. Now the Marshall Islands has gone to court to enforce compliance.
The nuclear club should be abolished and anybody who has a nuclear weapon is the enemy of mankind.

Historic lawsuits have been field by the tiny Republic of the Marshall Islands against the US and the eight other Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) to meet their treaty obligations to disarm.

Since 1970, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) has obligated nations to negotiate in good faith for complete disarmament - a world without nuclear weapons.

Forty-four years later, with no negotiations in sight, the world has become a more dangerous place with stockpiles of more than 17,000 nuclear weapons.

$1 trillion to spent on nuclear WMD over the next decade

Four more nations now have nuclear weapons, and the original five continue to invest in and modernize their nuclear forces with expenditures expected to be in excess of $1 trillion over the next 10 years.

A US government photograph of Operation Redwing's Apache nuclear explosion in the Pacific Ocean's Marshall Islands on July 9, 1956.

But one small nation has stood up to say "enough is enough". The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) has taken action in the International Court of Justice and in the US Federal District Court to compel the nine nuclear weapons nations to comply with their obligations, under the NPT and customary international law, and begin negotiations for nuclear zero.

They suffered a 12-year blitz of nuclear bomb tests

The Marshallese people know first-hand about the destructive consequences of living in a world with nuclear weapons. From 1946-1958, the US conducted 67 nuclear weapon tests in the Marshall Islands, the equivalent explosive power of one-and-a-half Hiroshima bombs detonated daily for 12 years.

They seek no compensation through these legal actions. Rather they act for the seven billion of us who live on this planet, to end the nuclear weapon threat hanging over all humanity.

For the past year, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation (NAPF) has served as a consultant to the RMI in support of this courageous initiative to fulfill the world's nuclear disarmament obligation.

They understand, as do the people of the Marshall Islands, that the only way to keep our loved ones safe is to relentlessly strive for the total elimination of nuclear weapons.

The issue is human survival

This is not a partisan issue, it is a survival issue. As a variety of world leaders have made clear, including former US Secretary of State George Shultz:

"The nuclear club should be abolished and anybody who has a nuclear weapon is the enemy of mankind."

And Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace Laureate:

"The failure of these countries to uphold important commitments and respect the law makes a more dangerous place. This is one of the most fundamental moral and legal questions of our time."

As a physician, I recognize nuclear weapons pose the greatest existential and public health threat to our world. There is no adequate response to nuclear war. Prevention is essential and abolition of these weapons is the only way to accomplish that goal.

 


 

Robert F. Dodge, M.D. serves on the boards of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation,Beyond WarPhysicians for Social Responsibility Los Angeles, and Citizens for Peaceful Resolutions, and writes for PeaceVoice.

This article was originally published by Consortium News.